advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership tutor2u

They may also feel that the leadership does not care about their needs and desires which is unproductive for organisations. In such organizations, the leader has a small number of tasks to handle and the number of employees is also few. One of the greatest advantages to working with an autocratic leader is that the employee always knows what's expected and what will happen if they fail to perform as expected. It is a negative cycle which only increases when the leader makes a poor decision that could have been avoided if a team consultation occurred. Degrades trust and morale: Autocratic leadership discourages input, which can make teams feel like their ideas are ignored and they're unable to contribute. advantages of democratic leadership. Employees, in turn, learn discipline and consistency from their leader. The style is closely linked with Mayo's Human Relation view of motivation and also the social needs of Maslow. Essentially, no one will be confused about the direction of a company or even the specific assignment they are working on. Autocratic leaders dont deal with the hassle of multiple leadership levels. Autocratic - quick decision making is guaranteed; Autocratic - good for inexperienced workers; . Team members may have opportunities to provide feedback; however, their feedback is highly unlikely to change the course of action. It is an easy way to cut through administrative red tape to ensure better communication to all workers. If that leader does not create a fair working environment, then it is difficult for any employees to change that environment. Autocratic leaders generally could use organizational . Experienced, skilled workers tend to do better in an environment where their leader asks for their input in decision-making or even leaves decision-making entirely up to them. Starting Business: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership, IPL.org: The Challenges of Autocratic Leadership Styles in Organizations and Individuals, Risk Vs. Autocracy Pros and Cons of Autocracy: Are There Reasons to Get a Grip? If an autocratic leader is put in charge of an inexperienced team, theyll be able to get the job done by outlining specific instructions to follow. Some employees dont like the idea of being asked to make an important decision about the future of the company. can swiftly take the team out of trouble. But, what is autocratic leadership? Faster Decision-making Proponents of this government form claim that having one ruler or person to decide on matters concerning a nation and without distractions and influences of others make it easier for the leader to make sound decisions he or she thinks works for the interest of the country. Motivation and reward for leaders: It provides strong motivation and reward for the leader. By the time the information reaches the front-line employees doing most of the work, the entire original message could be lost. Business, sports, politics, and many other fields have witnessed a great number of autocratic leaders throughout the history. Autocratic leaders exercise absolute control over the team. But, the results always lead to corporate success. This is an advantage because team members can continue projects, move deadlines, and remove obstacles that could negatively impact their overall productivity. In other styles, there is a risk that by the time employees receive the message, the entire original message could be lost or there could be multiple interpretations of the message that create confusion. These types of interactions do not create a sustainable working relationship, which ultimately creates productivity problems as workers experience lower morale levels. Transactional leadership is characterized by a leader/subordinate relationship governed by exchange, and with an autocratic leader, this exchange is total compliance with expectations for continued employment with the company. Managers with this type of leadership style, keep a close eye on what is happening in their organisations. This improves the speed of decisions because only one person is weighing the pros and cons of each choice, not a C-Suite. Autocratic leaders do not appreciate any inputs from their team members. As such, between them, there is no communication and you know communication is a must for a healthy relationship. It is a leadership style that is based on a lack of trust. Autocratic leaders have the opportunity to take full control, responsibility and stress and build and maintain a productive operation. When the leader is the only person in the organization who makes decisions and determines the companys strategy, they can easily feel overwhelmed. Disadvantages. Did you ever tell him about your awesome weekend? Since organisation is key to a well-operated business, autocratic leadership can prove useful in situations where the organisation could advance within the company. A democratic style of management will put trust in employees and encourage them to make decisions. There is no gray area for employee performance in this type of environment, which can be comforting for employees. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti pilihan pelajar terhadap aliran sains dan pola pilihan mengikut tahap kefahaman pengetahuan asas sains. Autocratic leadership always encourages one-way communication to eliminate this problem. Each person involved in autocratic organizations knows their position and role in achieving the desired target. Autocratic leaders rely on specific rules, policies, and procedures to govern all processes within the workplace. This may make many employees feeling intellectually stifled. These environments allow for an error margin of zero. Autocratic leadership is suitable when the organization is small. Each person benefits from the regulated competencies that are offered by the leader. 8. That creates a positive impact on the work environment, which leads to more accurate work and consistent production. It is one of the best. There may be dangerous situations or working environments which require complicated tasks to be completed. According to St. Thomas University, democratic leadership is defined by mutual respect between the manager and their team members. Inexperienced employees generally need a lot of hands-on guidance from their supervisors to learn their roles, learn how to perform their job duties effectively and learn how to work well within the organization. 9. Management Styles in a Business (GCSE) | Business | tutor2u When there is clear direction, with a path toward success, offered to workers, then they are able to focus on productivity instead of problem solving. More Cautious Find out more. They consult employees over issues and listen to their feedback or opinions. According to Startingbusiness.com, a significant drawback to working with an autocratic leader is the lack of flexibility in the workplace. What Is Autocratic Leadership? Definition, Pros and Cons Pros of Autocracy The following sections below demonstrate. Likewise, Leona Helmsley of the Helmsley hotel chain andMartha Stewart of MSLO are also considered to have exercised this type of leadership style. The result is a more consistent and accurate output. 2. Some people dont like the idea of coming up with new ideas. 2002-2023 Tutor2u Limited. If that leader goes away, then the team is unable to function because they were focused on their role. Each level of management can inadvertently (or purposely) put their own spin on the communication come from the leadership. Autocratic Leadership (Authoritarian): A leadership style in which an individual is in control of all the decisions and tasks and his/her "followers" have little to no say in the final decision. Second, autocratic leadership gives the leader an enormous amount of power in deciding how the team operates, but this also means increasing responsibility and accountability. They wont get blamed if it fails and they wont get credit if it succeeds. On the other hand, employees are responsible for following instructions and meeting deadlines. Productivity levels can see increases with this leadership style. Because of the strict method in which employees are micromanaged, there is no room for flexibility within the work environment. Leaders do not concern about whether or not subordinates are satisfied with their actions and instructions. There are a number of vital benefits to autocratic leadership, according to the Houston Chronicle. They, therefore, make all the strategic decisions without any or extremely little inputs from the people who work under them. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a style of leadership characterized by direct, top-down communication and commands. This leadership style can produce authoritative short-term results. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Autocratic Leadership, Poor Relationship Between the leader and Followers, Not Suitable for Large and Diversified Organizations, What is Organizational Change? Low satisfaction also results in below performance than expectations. Managers deal with their employees in different ways. That reduces the productivity available, and eventually leads to declining morale. It may create an unwelcome culture within the organization. That means the personal morality of the leader becomes the corporate reality of the business. For long-term issues, the autocratic leader can direct traffic in specific ways with more efficiency than a C-Suite, creating solutions that can quickly move an organization out of a troublesome state. The ultimate democratic system occurs when decisions are made based on the majority view of all workers. Decisions can be made faster with this leadership style. Although they set their rules and regulations to control the team, they also play a significant role in eradicating employee stress. Because of the vertical or one-way communication channel subordinates do not get the opportunity to share their ideas and thoughts. Though autocratic leadership style is often criticised, it is true that many historic autocratic leaders have been innovators who unleashed revolutions in different fields. Autocratic leaders do not take input from other members of a team in their decisions. List of Advantages of Autocracy Government 1. In most autocratic leadership structures, the leader is responsible for every action of the team. It is therefore easy for the autocratic leaders to make the organisational goals clear to the subordinates resulting in better and higher commitment to the accomplishment of the goals. Additionally, a leader like this improves workplace efficiency by instructing staff members on what to do and how to meet deadlines. When a team leaders style can be summarized with my way or the highway, that leader can accurately be called an autocrat.